⭐
Vendor Scorecard
Compare vendors using the 9-pillar evaluation framework from Chapter 8. Adjust weights and score criteria to make data-driven decisions.
0%
Poor
0 / 35 criteria scored
0%
Poor
0 / 35 criteria scored
+
Add Vendor C
Optional third comparison
⚖️
Regulatory & Data Integrity FitCompliance with FDA, EU GDP, WHO, and data integrity standards
Weight:5
Criterion
Vendor A
Vendor B
21 CFR Part 11 compliance demonstrated
EU Annex 11 compliance
ALCOA+ data integrity controls
Audit trail completeness
🗺️
Mapping MethodologyTemperature mapping study capabilities and protocols
Weight:4
🌡️
Hardware Performance & CalibrationSensor quality, accuracy, and calibration programs
Weight:4
💻
Software CapabilitiesPlatform features, usability, and functionality
Weight:5
Criterion
Vendor A
Vendor B
Real-time dashboard and visibility
Alarm configuration and escalation
Reporting and analytics
Mobile access and notifications
User experience and ease of use
🔌
Integration & IT FriendlinessSystem connectivity, APIs, and IT compatibility
Weight:3
📈
ScalabilityAbility to grow with organizational needs
Weight:3
🛠️
Services & SupportImplementation support, training, and ongoing service
Weight:4
👥
Decision Governance AlignmentVendor's approach to quality and compliance-led decisions
Weight:3
💰
Total Cost of OwnershipUpfront costs, ongoing fees, and hidden costs
Weight:4
Summary Comparison
Vendor A
0%
Poor
Vendor B
0%
Poor